Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):169-172 (2004)

In response to the failure of Zeelenberg, Plomp, and Raaijmakers to replicate the results of Seamon, Luo, and Gallo regarding their purported finding of a reliable false memory effect in the absence of memory for the list items, Gallo and Seamon report a new experiment that they claim shows that conscious activation of a related lure during study is not necessary for its subsequent recognition. We critically evaluate their conclusion and argue that the evidence clearly shows that false recognition is critically dependent on the conscious recollection of one or more of the list items. Thus, this as well as the previous experiments show no evidence for nonconscious processes in producing false memories
Keywords *Cognitive Processes  *False Memory  *Word Recognition
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2003.10.002
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,447
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #335,835 of 2,330,441 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #584,494 of 2,330,441 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes