On Carnap sentences

Analysis 71 (2):245-246 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The influential proposal that the analytical component of a theory is captured by its ‘Carnap sentence’ is critically scrutinized. A counterexample which makes the suggestion problematic is presented.

Similar books and articles

Carnap on Empirical Significance.Sebastian Lutz - 2017 - Synthese 194 (1):217-252.
Introspection and change in Carnap’s logical behaviourism.Allard Tamminga - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):650-667.
Carnap’s ramseyfications defended.Thomas Uebel - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (1):71-87.
Het logische behaviorisme van Rudolf Carnap.Allard Tamminga - 2003 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 65 (3):541 - 565.
Positivism and the Pragmatic Theory of Observation.Thomas Oberdan - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:25 - 37.
From within and from without. Two perspectives on analytic sentences.Olaf L. Müller - 2002 - In Wolfram Hinzen & Hans Rott (eds.), Belief and meaning: Essays at the interface. Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften.
Intentionality, Mind, And Language.Ausonio Marras (ed.) - 1972 - London: University Of Illinois Press.
Carnap and Incommensurability.Stathis Psillos - 2008 - Philosophical Inquiry 30 (1-2):135-156.
On belief-sentences.Rudolf Carnap - 1954 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):128--31.
Science and Analysis of Language.Rudolf Carnap - 1994 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 2:291-294.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-12

Downloads
540 (#32,213)

6 months
74 (#58,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Panu Raatikainen
Tampere University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references