What if I were in his shoes? On Hare's argument for preference utilitarianism

Theoria 62 (1-2):95-123 (1996)
Abstract
This paper discusses the argument for preference utilitarianism proposed by Richard Hare in Moral Thinking(Hare, 1981). G. F. Schueler (1984) and Ingmar Persson (1989) identified a serious gap in Hare’s reasoning, which might be called the No-Conflict Problem. The paper first tries to fill the gap. Then, however, starting with an idea of Zeno Vendler, the question is raised whether the gap is there to begin with. Unfortunately, this Vendlerian move does not save Hare from criticism. Paradoxically, it instead endangers the whole argumentative enterprise
Keywords Hare, Richard  universalization  preference utilitarianism  role reversal  Persson, Ingmar  Vendler, Zeno
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-2567.1996.tb00532.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,840
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A History of Theoria.Sven Ove Hansson - 2009 - Theoria 75 (1):2-27.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Hare's Defense of Utilitarianism.Thomas L. Carson - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 50 (1):97 - 115.
Hare on Utilitarianism and Intuitive Morality.Tom Carson - 1993 - Erkenntnis 39 (3):305 - 331.
Hare's Reductive Justification of Preference Utilitarianism.Roger Paden - 1996 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):361-378.
From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism.James W. McGray - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12 (142):79-86.
Hare's Argument for Utilitarianism.Michael McDermott - 1983 - Philosophical Quarterly 33 (133):386-391.
Philosophical Remarks on Peter Hare.John J. McDermott - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):73-77.
How to Make Ethical Universalization Tests Work.Scott Forschler - 2007 - Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (1):31-43.
A Critique of the Preference Utilitarian Objection to Killing People.Suzanne Uniacke - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (2):209 – 217.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-13

Total downloads

100 ( #51,439 of 2,178,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #45,115 of 2,178,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums