Power, Hegemony, and Social Reality in Gramsci and Searle

Journal of Political Power 9 (2):227-247 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper reconstructs Gramsci’s account of social objects in light of recent developments in analytic social ontology. It combines elements of Gramsci’s account with that of John Searle, and argues that when taken together their theories constitute a robust account of social reality and a nuanced view of the relation between social reality and power. Searle provides a detailed analysis of the creation of social entities at the level of the agent, while Gramsci, by employing his concepts of hegemony and domination, is able to provide an analysis of the differential ability of societal subgroups to construct the social world.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Just What is Social Ontology?Baker Lynne Rudder - 2019 - Journal of Social Ontology 5 (1):1-12.
Power and Social Ontology.Åsa Andersson - 2007 - Lund: Bokbox Publications.
Language, Agency and Hegemony: A Gramscian Response to Post‐Marxism.Peter Ives - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):455-468.
Gramsci e Foucault, Foucault e Gramsci.Pietro Maltese - 2017 - Materialismo Storico 2 (1):164-202.
Searle's social reality.Stephen P. Turner - 1999 - History and Theory 38 (2):211–231.
Gramsci as a spatial theorist.Bob Jessop - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):421-437.
Althusser and Poulantzas: Hegemony and the State.Panagiotis Sotiris - 2017 - Materialismo Storico 2 (1):115-163.
Searle on social institutions: A critique.Wolfgang Balzer - 2002 - Dialectica 56 (3):195–211.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-02

Downloads
1,057 (#11,799)

6 months
409 (#4,194)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Rachar
Freie Universität Berlin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations