Jiri Raclavsky
Masaryk University
The paper describes the solution to semantic paradoxes pioneered by Pavel Tichý and further developed by the present author. Its main feature is an examination (and then refutation) of the hidden premise of paradoxes that the paradox-producing expression really means what it seems to mean. Semantic concepts are explicated as relative to language, thus also language is explicated. The so-called ‘explicit approach’ easily treats paradoxes in which language is explicitly referred to. The residual paradoxes are solved by the ‘implicit approach’ which employs ideas made explicit by the former one.
Keywords semantic paradoxes  truth  denotation  liar
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Foundations of Frege’s Logic.Pavel Tichý - 1988 - Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.
The Liar Paradox, Meaning and Truth.Jiri Raclavsky - 2009 - Filosoficky Casopis 57 (3):325-351.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Substitution Inconsistencies in Transparent Intensional Logic.Miloš Kosterec - 2021 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 31 (3-4):355-371.
Inter-Model Connectives and Substructural Logics.Igor Sedlár - 2014 - In Roberto Ciuni, Heinrich Wansing & Caroline Willkommen (eds.), Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic (Proceedings of Trends in Logic XI). Springer. pp. 195-209.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Truth, the Liar, and Relativism.Kevin Scharp - 2013 - Philosophical Review 122 (3):427-510.
What the Liar Taught Achilles.Gary Mar & Paul St Denis - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.
Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox.J. C. Beall (ed.) - 2003 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Definability and the Structure of Logical Paradoxes.Haixia Zhong - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):779 - 788.
A Revenge-Immune Solution to the Semantic Paradoxes.Hartry Field - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (2):139-177.
Paradoxes of Intensionality.Dustin Tucker & Richmond H. Thomason - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):394-411.
Definition Inclosed: A Reply to Zhong.Graham Priest - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):789 - 795.


Added to PP index

Total views
341 ( #29,662 of 2,498,022 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #56,058 of 2,498,022 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes