Westminster Versions [Book Review]

The Classical Review 24 (4):131-132 (1910)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0009840X00045005
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,343
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Was Max Weber Wrong About Westminster?K. Palonen - 2014 - History of Political Thought 35 (3):519-537.
Four Versions of Double Effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
Analyzing Dignity: A Perspective From the Ethics of Care.Carlo Leget - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):945-952.
Wavefunction Tails in the Modal Interpretation.Michael Dickson - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:366 - 376.
A Unified Tenseless Theory of Time.Cheng-Chih Tsai - 2011 - Prolegomena 10 (1):5-37.
Global Supervenience and Dependence.Karen Bennett - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):501-529.
Versions and "Versions," Forgeries and "Forgeries": A Response to Kirk Pillow.Peter Kivy - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):180-182.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
5 ( #1,167,814 of 2,445,338 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,131 of 2,445,338 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes