Beyond the "Mendel-Fisher controversy"

Abstract

Worries about fraudulent data should give way to broader critiques of Mendel's legacy

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

P's in a pod: Some recipes for cooking Mendel's data.Teddy Seidenfeld - unknown
THE HYBRIDIZATION WORK OF MENDEL, 102 YEARS AFTER STARTING THE CONTROVERSY.Rafael María Román-Bravo, Rogelio Garcidueñas-Piña, Ruy Ortiz-Rodríguez, Atilio Miguel Atencio-León, Luis Fabian Yáñez-Cuéllar & Jose Atilio Aranguren-Méndez - 2014 - Revista Cientifica, FCV-LUZ 24 (1):38-46.
Ending the Mendel–Fisher Controversy. [REVIEW]Avital Pilpel - 2009 - Isis 100:173-174.
Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866).Avital Pilpel - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):618-626.
Ending the Mendel-Fisher Controversy.Allan Franklin, A. W. F. Edwards, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Daniel L. Hartl & Teddy Seidenfeld - 2008 - Journal of the History of Biology 41 (4):775-777.
Science studies and Mendel's paradigm.Vítězslav Orel - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (2):pp. 226-241.
Determinism and Human Action.Mendel Fisher Cohen - 1961 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
History of Plant Hybridization According to Mendel's Contemporary Rudolf Geschwind.Vítězslav Orel - 1986 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 8 (2):251 - 263.
The real objective of Mendel's paper: A response to Monaghan and Corcos. [REVIEW]Raphael Falk & Sahotra Sarkar - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):447-451.
What would have happened if Darwin had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?Pablo Lorenzano - 2011 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (1):3-48.
Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and neyman–pearson.Johannes Lenhard - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
Der Mendelismus Und Die Philosophischen Probleme der Modernen Genetik.Ivan Timofeevich Frolov & S. A. Pastushnyi - 1981 - Akademie Verlag.
Mendelizm I Filosofskie Problemy Sovremennoi Genetiky.Ivan Timofeevich Frolov & Stefan Alekseevich Pastushnyi - 1976 - Mysl.
Autobiographia iuvenulia. Ad centesimum quinquagesimum J. G. Mendel natalem by Gregorii Mendel; Josef Sajner. [REVIEW]John Berg - 1973 - Isis 64:134-134.
Was Mendel's paper on Pisum neglected or unknown?Michael H. MacRoberts - 1985 - Annals of Science 42 (3):339-345.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-02

Downloads
52 (#300,476)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Radick
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

Genetic Determinism in the Genetics Curriculum.Annie Jamieson & Gregory Radick - 2017 - Science & Education 26 (10):1261-1290.
Mendel the fraud? A social history of truth in genetics.Gregory Radick - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 93 (C):39-46.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references