Distinguishing value-neutrality from value-independence: Toward a new disentangling strategy for moral epistemology

In Mark McBride & Visa A. J. Kurki (eds.), Without Trimmings: The Legal, Moral and Political Philosophy of Matthew Kramer (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This chapter outlines a new disentangling strategy for moral epistemology. It builds on the fundamental distinction between value-neutrality and value-independence as two separate aspects of methodological austerity introduced by Matthew Kramer. This type of conceptual analysis is then applied to two major challenges in moral epistemology: globalised scepticism and debate fragmentation. Both challenges arise from collapsing the fact/value dichotomy. They can be addressed by comprehensive disentangling that runs along both dimensions – value neutrality vs. value non-neutrality and value independence vs. value dependence. The success of this strategy rests on two factors. The first is broadening the scope of disentangling to include theoretical-explanatory values on a par with distinctly ethical values. The second is differentiating between wider and narrower conceptualisations of what value neutrality requires with respect to contested matters. The objective is to pre-empt unjust theorising, a distinctive form of epistemic injustice that derives from the exclusive methodological focus on ethical evaluations at the expense of epistemic ones. When these methodological conditions are fulfilled, opponents should gain the confidence to treat each other as fellow inquirers engaged in the same project, that of reducing the scope of unhelpful disagreements.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neutrality and the Social Contract.Ian J. Carroll - 2009 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 4 (2):134-150.
Political morality and neutrality.Michal Sládecek - 2018 - Filozofija I Društvo 29 (3):401-414.
Advocating Procedural Neutrality.Linda Bomstad - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):197-210.
The Impossibility of Political Neutrality.Noriaki Iwasa - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):147-155.
What Is Neutrality?Roland Pierik & Wibren Van der Burg - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (4):496-515.
Advocating Procedural Neutrality.Linda Bornstad - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):197-210.
Why Liberal Neutralists Should Accept Educational Neutrality.Matt Sensat Waldren - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):71-83.
Epistemic Communities and Political Society.Alexander Jozef Zieba - 2001 - Dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston (Canada)


Added to PP

149 (#100,138)

6 months
25 (#76,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lubomira Radoilska
University of Kent

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethics and the limits of philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1985 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1985 - Cambridge, Mass.: Routledge.

View all 47 references / Add more references