Exploring Philosophical Issues in the Patenting of Scientific and Technological Inventions

Philosophy and Technology 26 (3):283-300 (2013)

Authors
Hans Radder
VU University Amsterdam
Abstract
Thus far, the philosophical study of patenting has primarily focused on sociopolitical, legal, and ethical issues, such as the moral justifiability of patenting living organisms or the nature of (intellectual) property. In addition, however, the theory and practice of patenting entails many important problems that can be fruitfully studied from the perspective of the philosophy of science and technology. The principal aim of this article is to substantiate the latter claim. For this purpose, I first provide a concise review of the main features of the theory and practice of the patenting of scientific and technological inventions. Second, I discuss several philosophical issues implied by these features and explore the possible contributions of the philosophy of science and technology to the clarification, or resolution, of these issues. The seven features discussed are: patents as commercial monopolies on scientific and technological inventions, the contrast between natural and non-natural subject matter, the distinction between inventions and discoveries, the reproducibility of inventions, the question of the sameness of two inventions, the distinction between the invented and the protected object, and the contrast between material objects versus concepts and theories. The article concludes with some observations on the problems and prospects of the philosophical study of the theory and practice of patenting scientific and technological inventions
Keywords Philosophy of science and technology  Theory and practice of patenting  Scientific and technological inventions
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13347-013-0109-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,649
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Tacit Dimension. --.Michael Polanyi & Amartya Sen - 1966 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Science, the Very Idea.Steve Woolgar - 1988 - Tavistock Publications.
Ten Problems in History and Philosophy of Science.Peter Galison - 2008 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 99:111-124.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How Inclusive Is European Philosophy of Science?Hans Radder - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):149-165.
Intellectual Property, Globalization, and Left-Libertarianism.Constantin Vică - 2015 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 2 (3):323–345.
Which Scientific Knowledge is a Common Good?Hans Radder - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (5):431-450.
Pesticides and the Patent Bargain.Cristian Timmermann - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (1):1-19.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Human Gene Patents: Core Issues in a Multi-Layered Debate. [REVIEW]Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):211-221.
Ethics and Patentability in Biotechnology.Rafał Witek - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):105-111.
Men, Machines, and Modern Times.Elting Elmore Morison - 1966 - Cambridge: Mass., M.I.T. Press.
The Patentability of Human Genes: An Ethical Debate in the European Community.Jose Elizalde - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):318 – 323.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-01

Total views
58 ( #133,609 of 2,242,384 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #815,341 of 2,242,384 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature