Justification and the authority of norms

Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (4):451-461 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX


What features does a norm have to have such that we really ought to follow it? This paper argues that norms are authoritative when they are justified in a particular sense. However, this brand of justification is not any of those with which we are currently familiar. The authority of norms is not a matter of moral, epistemic or prudential justification. It depends instead on what I call "justification simpliciter." The concept of justification simpliciter is defined and defended in this paper.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hypothetical and Categorical Epistemic Normativity.Chase B. Wrenn - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):273-290.
A Normative Regress Problem.Linda Radzik - 1999 - American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1):35-47.
Belief, normativity and the constitution of agency.Emer O'Hagan - 2005 - Philosophical Explorations 8 (1):39-52.
Legal validity and the infinite regress.Oliver Black - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (4):339 - 368.
Justification and the right to believe.Jeffrey Glick - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):532-544.
A coherentist theory of normative authority.Linda Radzik - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (1):21-42.
Incorrigible Norms: Foundationalist Theories of Normative Authority.Linda Radzik - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):633-649.


Added to PP

67 (#180,788)

6 months
3 (#226,063)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Linda Radzik
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references