Gregory Radick
University of Leeds
Concentrating on genetics, this paper examines the strength of the links between our biological science -- our biology -- and the particular history which brought that science into being. Would quite different histories have produced roughly the same science? Or, on the contrary, would different histories have produced other, quite different biologies? One emphasis throughout is on the kinds of evidence that might be brought to bear from the actual past in order to assess claims about what might have been. Another emphasis is on the implications for debates on realism and antirealism about genes.
Keywords Counterfactual history of science  Contingency of science  Genetics  Mendelism  W. F. R. Weldon  Lysenkoism  Incommensurability  Realism about genes  Antirealism about genes
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s135824610505602x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,607
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):421-423.
The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences.Ian Hacking - 1992 - In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press. pp. 29--64.
Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.Stephen Jay Gould - 1991 - Journal of the History of Biology 24 (1):163-165.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Beyond Mendelism and Biometry.Yafeng Shan - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89:155-163.
State of the Field: Are the Results of Science Contingent or Inevitable?Katherina Kinzel - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 52:55-66.
Inevitability, Contingency, and Epistemic Humility.Ian James Kidd - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:12-19.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Introduction: Histories of Postmodernism.Mark Bevir, Jill Hargis & Sara Rushing - 2007 - In Mark Bevir, Jill Hargis & Sara Rushing (eds.), Histories of Postmodernism. Routledge.
The Forgetting of Gender and the New Histories of Philosophy.Eileen O'Neill - 2004 - Teaching New Histories of Philosophy:87-98.


Added to PP index

Total views
47 ( #244,858 of 2,533,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,998 of 2,533,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes