Three Views On Propositions: King, Soames and Speaks [Book Review]

Analysis 77 (1):189-197 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/anw053

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

New Thinking About Propositions.Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames & Jeff Speaks - 2014 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. Edited by Scott Soames & Jeffrey Speaks.
Should Propositions Proliferate?Bjørn Jespersen - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):243-251.
Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames, Jeff Speaks, New Thinking about Propositions. [REVIEW]Thomas Hodgson - 2014 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):80-83.
Cognitive propositions.Stephen Schiffer - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (9):2551-2563.
Soames’s new conception of propositions.Ben Caplan - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (9):2533-2549.
Benacerraf’s revenge.Ben Caplan & Chris Tillman - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (S1):111-129.
What Role Should Propositions Have in the Theory of Meaning? Review Essay: Scott Soames. What is meaning?: Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. Pp. ix, 132.Kirk Ludwig - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):885-901.
The Propositions We Assert.Stavroula Glezakos - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (2):165-173.
Propositions and Attitudes.Nathan Salmon & Scott Soames (eds.) - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The nature and structure of content by Jeffrey C. King. [REVIEW]Thomas Bontly - 2009 - Analysis 69 (2):365-367.
Facts, properties, and the nature of the proposition.Jeff Speaks - manuscript
Truth and meaning redux.Ernie Lepore & Kirk Ludwig - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):251-77.
Cutting it (too) fine.John Collins - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):143-172.
On fineness of grain.Jeffrey C. King - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781.
Are Propositions Essentially Representational?Bryan Pickel - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-18

Downloads
103 (#165,954)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Radulescu
University of Missouri, Columbia

Citations of this work

Act‐type theories of propositions.Thomas Hodgson - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (11).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Propositional Content.Peter Hanks - 2015 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
The nature and structure of content.Jeffrey C. King - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Rethinking Language, Mind, and Meaning.Scott Soames - 2015 - Princeton University Press.
Propositions.Trenton Merricks - 2015 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references