Sverre Raffnsøe
Copenhagen Business School
Since the Enlightenment, critique has played an overarching role in how Western society understands itself and its basic institutions. However, opinions differ widely concerning the understanding and evaluation of critique. To understand such differences and clarify a viable understanding of critique, the article turns to Kant’s critical philosophy, inaugurating the “age of criticism”. While generalizing and making critique unavoidable, Kant coins an unambiguously positive understanding of critique as an affirmative, immanent activity. Not only does this positive conception prevail in the critique of pure and practical reason and the critique of judgment; these modalities of critique set the agenda for three major strands of critique in contemporary thought, culminating in among others Husserl, Popper, Habermas, Honneth, and Foucault. Critique affirms and challenges cognition and its rationality, formulates ethical ideals that regulate social interaction, and further articulates normative guidelines underway in the ongoing experimentations of a post-natural history of human nature. In contradistinction to esoteric Platonic theory, philosophy at the threshold of modernity becomes closely linked to an outward-looking critique that examines and pictures what human forms of life are in the process of making of themselves and challenges them, by reflecting upon what they can and what they should make of themselves. As a very widely diffused practice, however, critique may also become a self-affirming overarching end in itself.
Keywords Man  Foucault  Affirmative critique  distinction  reason  Heidegger  Kant  Enlightenment  Schlegel  philosophy  practice  Habermas  Plato  judgment  anthropology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,750
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
Giving an Account of Oneself.Judith Butler - 2005 - Fordham University Press.

View all 77 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Editorial: Why is Outlines – Critical Practice Studies so Critical?Pernille Hviid - 2018 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 19 (1):01-06.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Critique as Technology of the Self.Matthew Sharpe - 2005 - Foucault Studies 2:97-116.
The Origins of Kant's "Critique of Judgment".Ted Kinnaman - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique.Titus Stahl - 2013 - Constellations 20 (4):533-552.
Critique of the Power of Judgment.Paul Guyer & Eric Matthews (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Adorno, Foucault and Critique.Deborah Cook - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (10):0191453713507016.


Added to PP index

Total views
18 ( #576,029 of 2,438,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #436,491 of 2,438,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes