Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect

Yale University Press (2009)

Authors
Paul Anthony Rahe
Hillsdale College
Abstract
In 1989, the Cold War abruptly ended and it seemed as if the world was at last safe for democracy. But a spirit of uneasiness, discontent, and world-weariness soon arose and has persisted in Europe, in America, and elsewhere for two decades. To discern the meaning of this malaise we must investigate the nature of liberal democracy, says the author of this provocative book, and he undertakes to do so through a detailed investigation of the thinking of Montesquieu, Rousseau, and Tocqueville. Paul A. Rahe argues that these political thinkers anticipated the modern liberal republic's propensity to drift in the direction of “soft despotism”—a condition that arises within a democracy when paternalistic state power expands and gradually undermines the spirit of self-government. Such an eventuality, feared by Tocqueville in the nineteenth century, has now become a reality throughout the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. So Rahe asserts, and he explains what must be done to reverse this unfortunate trend.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
ISBN(s) 9780300164237   9780300144925
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,491
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Montesquieu's Natural Rights Constitutionalism.Paul A. Rahe - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):51-81.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville.Cheryl B. Welch (ed.) - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Tocqueville and the Liberal Res Publica.André Van de Putte - 2010 - Ethical Perspectives 17 (3):475.
Who Needs Anciennete? Tocqueville on Aristocracy and Modernity.S. Drescher - 2003 - History of Political Thought 24 (4):624-646.
Philosophical Essays.Teodros Kiros - 2011 - Red Sea Press.
Politesse and Public Opinion in Stendhal's Red and Black.Richard Boyd - 2005 - European Journal of Political Theory 4 (4):367-392.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-08-22

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes