Mumford on Absence & Nothing

Analysis 83 (1):186-197 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Who wouldn’t want to hear it said of their new book, ‘nothing would improve this’? Stephen Mumford wouldn’t! His Absence & Nothing: The Philosophy of What T.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Art and Technics.Lewis Mumford - 2000 - Columbia University Press.
Mumford on aesthetic–moral interaction in sport.Jason Holt - 2017 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44 (1):72-80.
Luck and miracles.Steve Clarke - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (4):471-474.
Dispositions.Stephen Mumford - 1994 - Cogito 8 (2):141-146.
In defence of Mumford's definition of a miracle.Morgan Luck - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (4):465-469.
Intentionality and the Physical: A Reply to Mumford.Ullin T. Place - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (195):225-231.
Intention, description and the aesthetic: the by-product argument.Leon Culbertson - 2016 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (3):440-453.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-21

Downloads
67 (#237,519)

6 months
14 (#170,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrea Raimondi
Nottingham University
Mark Jago
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Assertion.Peter Geach - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (4):449-465.
Being Positive About Negative Facts.Mark Jago & Stephen Barker - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):117-138.
On what there is.W. V. O. Quine - 1948 - Review of Metaphysics 2 (5):21-38.

Add more references