In Favor of Impropriety

Constructivist Foundations 15 (3):213-216 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heras-Escribano argues against the normative character of affordances from a framework that relies on a Wittgensteinian notion of normativity and the incompatibility of direct perception, …

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defence of a Relational Ontology of Affordances.Julian Kiverstein - 2020 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (3):226-229.
Reclaiming Meaning, Reclaiming Normativity.Laura Mojica - 2020 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (3):216-218.
Are affordances normative?Manuel Heras-Escribano & Manuel de Pinedo - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):565-589.
Are affordances normative?Manuel Pinedo & Manuel Heras-Escribano - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):565-589.
How Far Can Sensorimotor Direct Realism Go?M. Mossio - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):287-289.
What’s Wrong with Affordances?Louise Barrett - 2020 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (3):229-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-06

Downloads
28 (#789,065)

6 months
6 (#827,406)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Vicente Raja
University of Western Ontario

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references