Society and Animals 15 (4):311-328 (2007)
AbstractCollege students judged dog or cat misbehavior via questionnaire items. Common factor analysis yielded 3 dimensions of student response: the sinner ; the sin ; and mercy . Correlations among sinner, sin, and mercy factor scores supported predictions from causal attribution theory. Nevertheless, cross-tabulation analysis revealed that nearly 90% of all respondents endorsed mercy , regardless of the extent to which the animals were seen as sinners , or evaluations of the level of sin . Absolutely high average mercy scores indicated an animal positivity bias. Results thus evoked the adage that "the quality of mercy is not strained." That is, regarding errant companion animals, cognitive responses to punish and to forgive are not always mutually exclusive options
Similar books and articles
Understanding bias in scientific practice.Nancy E. Shaffer - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):97.
Temporal delays can facilitate causal attribution: Towards a general timeframe bias in causal induction.Marc J. Buehner & Stuart McGregor - 2006 - Thinking and Reasoning 12 (4):353 – 378.
Is Forgiveness the Deliberate Refusal to Punish?Brandon Warmke - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):613-620.
On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.Eyal Shahar & Doron J. Shahar - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1214-1216.
Hostile Attribution Bias and Negative Reciprocity Beliefs Exacerbate Incivility’s Effects on Interpersonal Deviance.Long-Zeng Wu, Haina Zhang, Randy K. Chiu, Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaogang He - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 120 (2):189-199.
Two arguments against the punishment-forbearance account of forgiveness.Brandon Warmke - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):915-920.
Is It Possible and Sometimes Desirable for States to Forgive?Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (3):417-434.
Out of sequence communications can affect causal judgement.John Patrick, Lewis Bott, Phillip L. Morgan & Sophia L. King - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (2):133 - 158.
Patterns of Moral Judgment Derive From Nonmoral Psychological Representations.Fiery Cushman & Liane Young - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (6):1052-1075.
Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.Eyal Shahar - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (3):436-440.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads