Science and Engineering Ethics:1-19 (forthcoming)

Authors
Erick Ramirez
Santa Clara University
Scott LaBarge
Santa Clara University
Abstract
We aim to generate a dilemma for virtual reality-based research that we motivate through an extended case study of Judith Thomson’s (1985) Bridge variant of the trolley problem. Though the problem we generate applies more broadly than the Bridge problem, we believe it makes a good exemplar of the kind of case we believe is problematic. First, we argue that simulations of these thought experiments run into a practicality horn that makes it practically impossible to produce them. These problems revolve around concepts that we call “perspectival fidelity”and “context realism.” Moral dilemmas that include features present in the Bridge variant will, as a result, be practically impossible to simulate. We also argue that, should we be wrong about the practical impossibility of creating a VR simulation of Bridge, such a simulation must face an ethical horn which renders these simulations ethically impermissible to develop or use. For these reasons, we argue that it is virtually impossible to simulate the bridge problem (and other thought experiments with similar features) both practically and ethically in VR.
Keywords thought experiments  Judith Thomson  Experimental Philosophy  virtual reality  applied ethics  experimental ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-020-00267-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Self-Sacrifice and the Trolley Problem.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (5):662-672.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Empathy and the Limits of Thought Experiments.Erick Ramirez - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (4):504-526.
Real Moral Problems in the Use of Virtual Reality.Erick Jose Ramirez & Scott LaBarge - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology (4):249-263.
Thomson's Trolley Problem.Peter Graham - 2017 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 12 (2):168-190.
A Moderate Defence of the Use of Thought Experiments in Applied Ethics.Adrian Walsh - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):467-481.
How to (Dis)Solve the Gamer’s Dilemma.Erick Jose Ramirez - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (1):1-21.
Living in Conceivable Worlds.Ivan M. Havel - 1998 - Foundations of Science 3 (2):375-394.
Thought Experiments in Ethics: A Contextualist Approach to the Grounding Problem.Leslie Anne Harland - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Thought Experiments in Experimental Philosophy.Kirk Ludwig - 2016 - In Mike Stuart, James Robert Brown & Yiftach J. H. Fehige (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. New York: Routledge. pp. 385-405.
Abortion and Ownership.John Martin Fischer - 2013 - The Journal of Ethics 17 (4):275-304.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-13

Total views
56 ( #172,667 of 2,362,053 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #11,993 of 2,362,053 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes