Human Nature in a Post-essentialist World

Philosophy of Science 80 (5):983-993 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I examine a well-known articulation of human nature skepticism, a paper by Hull. I then review a recent reply to Hull by Machery, which argues for an account of human nature that he claims is both useful and scientifically robust. I challenge Machery’s account and introduce an alternative account—the “life-history trait cluster” conception of human nature—that I hold is scientifically sound and makes sense of our intuitions about—and desiderata for—human nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-07

Downloads
168 (#118,797)

6 months
29 (#110,153)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Foundations of Language 13 (1):145-151.
On Human Nature.David L. Hull - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:3-13.
A plea for human nature.Edouard Machery - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (3):321 – 329.

View all 6 references / Add more references