Razumijevanje pitanjâ u logici i matematici: Mill vs. Carnap

Prolegomena 5 (2):209-218 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whether mathematical truths are syntactical or empirical might seem merely an academic topic. However, it becomes a practical concern as soon as we consider the role of questions. For if we inquire as to the truth of a mathematical statement, this question must be meaningless for Carnap, as its truth or falsity is certain in advance due to its purely syntactical nature. In contrast, for Mill such a question is as valid as any other. These differing views have their consequences for contemporaryerotetic logic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
12 (#1,062,297)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Esther Ramharter
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references