Authors
Per-Erik Milam
University of California, San Diego (PhD)
Erick José Ramirez
Santa Clara University
Miles Elliott
Santa Clara University
Abstract
In this article, we apply the literature on the ethics of choice-architecture (nudges) to the realm of virtual reality (VR) to point out ethical problems with using VR for empathy-based nudging. Specifically, we argue that VR simulations aiming to enhance empathic understanding of others via perspective-taking will almost always be unethical to develop or deploy. We argue that VR-based empathy enhancement not only faces traditional ethical concerns about nudge (autonomy, welfare, transparency), but also a variant of the semantic variance problem that arises for intersectional perspective-taking. VR empathy simulations deceive and manipulate their users about their experiences. Despite their often laudable goals, such simulations confront significant ethical challenges. In light of these goals and challenges, we conclude by proposing that VR designers shift from designing simulations aimed at producing empathic perspective-taking to designing simulations aimed at generating sympathy. These simulations, we claim, can avoid the most serious ethical issues associated with VR nudges, semantic variance, and intersectionality
Keywords virtual reality  philosophy of technology  nudge  applied ethics  intersectionality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-021-09594-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Real Moral Problems in the Use of Virtual Reality.Erick Jose Ramirez & Scott LaBarge - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology (4):249-263.
Nudging in Interpersonal Contexts.Yashar Saghai - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (6):33-34.
Nudging, Transparency, and Watchfulness.Viktor Ivanković & Bart Engelen - 2019 - Social Theory and Practice 45 (1):43-73.
Ethical Issues with Simulating the Bridge Problem in VR.Erick Jose Ramirez & Scott LaBarge - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3313-3331.
The Nature of Empathy.Jakob Eklund - 2013 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 20 (1):28-38.
Nudges and Cultural Variance: a Note on Selinger and Whyte.Luc Bovens - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):483-486.
The Virtual Other: Empathy in the Age of Virtuality.Thomas Fuchs - 2014 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (5-6):152-173.
Thinking Harder About Nudges.T. M. Wilkinson - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):486-486.
The Importance of Empathy.Clea Frances Rees - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-04-19

Total views
79 ( #129,258 of 2,425,259 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
79 ( #8,987 of 2,425,259 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes