Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6):457 - 471 (1990)

Abstract
Using 94 published empirical articles in academic journals as a data base, this paper provides a critical review of the methodology employed in the study of ethical beliefs and behavior of organizational members. The review revealed that full methodological detail was provided in less than one half of the articles. Further, the majority of empirical research articles expressed no concern for the reliability or validity of measures, were characterized by low response rates, used convenience samples, and did not offer a theoretic framework, hypotheses, or a definition of ethics. Several recommendations, including a reviewer rating form addressing methodological decisions and inclusion of methodologists on the review panel, are offered to improve methodological rigor in published ethics research.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00382838
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.Lee J. Cronbach & P. E. Meehl - 1956 - In Herbert Feigl & Michael Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. , Vol. pp. 1--174.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach.Mark S. Schwartz - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 139 (4):755-776.

View all 144 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
100 ( #109,018 of 2,454,519 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,727 of 2,454,519 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes