Quantum Superposition, Necessity and the Identity of Indiscernibles
Those who interpret quantum mechanics literally are forced to follow some variant of Everett's relative state formulation (or "many worlds" interpretation). It is generally assumed that this is a rather bizarre result that many physicists (especially cosmologists) have been forced into because of the evidence. I look at the history of philosophy, however, reveals that rationalism has always flirted with this very idea, from Parmenides to Leibniz to modern times. I will survey some of the philosophical history, and show how the so-called paradox of quantum superposition can be considered a consequence of basic rationalist assumptions such as the principle of sufficient reason and the identity of indiscernibles.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and Quantum Mechanics.James Ladyman & Tomasz Bigaj - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (1):117-136.
Particle Labels and the Theory of Indistinguishable Particles in Quantum Mechanics.Michael Redhead & Paul Teller - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):201-218.
The Identity of Indiscernibles as a Logical Truth.Gerald Keaney - 2007 - Crossroads 1 (2):28-36 Free Online.
What It Feels Like to Be in a Superposition, and Why: Consciousness and the Interpretation of Everett's Quantum Mechanics.C. Lehner - 1997 - Synthese 110 (2):191-216.
What It Feels Like to Be in a Superposition. And Why.Christoph Lehner - 1997 - Synthese 110 (2):191-216.
Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Revisited.Robert C. Hilborn & Candice L. Yuca - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (3):355-389.
On Witness-Discernibility of Elementary Particles.Øystein Linnebo & F. A. Muller - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (5):1133-1142.
Universe Superposition, Relational Quantum Mechanics, and the Reality of the No-Collapse Universe.Andrew Soltau - unknown
Brute Facts, the Necessity of Identity, and the Identity of Indiscernibles.Charles B. Cross - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):1-10.
Two Spheres, Twenty Spheres, and the Identity of Indiscernibles.Michael Della Rocca - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):480–492.
Does Quantum Mechanics Disprove the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles?R. L. Barnette - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (3):466-470.
Why the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles is Not Contingently True Either.Steven French - 1989 - Synthese 78 (2):141 - 166.
Physics and Leibniz's Principles.Simon Saunders - 2003 - In Katherine Brading & Elena Castellani (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge University Press. pp. 289--307.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads4 ( #624,924 of 2,143,472 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.