Rationally Maintaining a Worldview

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9):1-14 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Epistemic Benefits of Worldview Disagreement.Kirk Lougheed - 2021 - Social Epistemology 35 (1):85-98.
The Epistemic Value of Civil Disagreement.Christopher W. Love - 2021 - Social Theory and Practice 47 (4):629-655.
What is Deep Disagreement?Chris Ranalli - 2018 - Topoi 40 (5):983-998.
Deep disagreement and hinge epistemology.Chris Ranalli - 2020 - Synthese 197 (11):4975-5007.
Common Sense, Scepticism and Deep Epistemic Disagreements.Angélique Thébert - 2020 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 10 (2):129-155.
Wittgenstein and Deep Disagreement.Ranalli Chris - 2017 - The Philosophers' Magazine 79:50-55.
Resolving deep disagreement.Vesel Memedi - 2007 - In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Ossa.
Religious Beliefs as World-View Beliefs.Winfried Löffler - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (3):7-25.
Problems of Deep Disagreement.Artur Ravilevich Karimov - 2019 - Dialogue and Universalism 29 (2):239-242.
Epistemic injustice and deepened disagreement.T. J. Lagewaard - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (5):1571-1592.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-22

Downloads
127 (#137,115)

6 months
97 (#39,129)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Ranalli
VU University Amsterdam