In C. Illies & C. Schaefer (eds.), Metaphysics or Modernity? Bamberg University Press. pp. 113-148 (2013)

Authors
Christopher Ranalli
VU University Amsterdam
Abstract
How should we understand the relationship between the contents of our color, causal, modal, and evaluative beliefs, on the one hand, and color, causal, modal, and evaluative properties, on the other? According to Barry Stroud (2011), because of the nature of the contents of those types of beliefs, we should also think that what he calls a “negative metaphysical verdict” on the latter is not one that we could consistently maintain. The metaphysical project aims to arrive at an improved conception of ourselves and our relation the world, no matter if that conception is positive or negative. But if Stroud is right that we cannot consistently arrive at the view that all of our causal, modal, and evaluative beliefs are systematically false, we will see that we cannot consistently reach the negative verdict. But failure to reach the negative verdict doesn’t mean that we have reached the positive verdict. Stroud calls this philosophical failure “metaphysical dissatisfaction”. In this paper, I argue that we can appropriate a metaepistemological response to the problem of the external world which shares its core features with Stroud’s (2000, 2011) arguments, but which nevertheless leaves us with a distinctive kind of epistemological dissatisfaction.
Keywords Transcendental Arguments  Barry Stroud  Problem of the External World  Donald Davidson  Externalism  Epistemological Dissatisfaction  Skepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is It Like to Be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Essence and Modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:1-16.
Solving the Skeptical Problem.Keith DeRose - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):1-52.
The Skeptic and the Dogmatist.James Pryor - 2000 - Noûs 34 (4):517–549.
Nonindexical Contextualism.John MacFarlane - 2009 - Synthese 166 (2):231-250.

View all 67 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Radical Scepticism, How-Possible Questions and Modest Transcendental Arguments.Ju Wang - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (2):210-226.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Modest Transcendental Arguments.Anthony Brueckner - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:265-280.
Transcendental Arguments and 'Epistemological Naturalism'.Barry Stroud - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 31 (2):105 - 115.
Epistemological Reflection on Knowledge of the External World.Review author[S.]: Barry Stroud - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2):345-358.
Epistemological Realism as the Skeptic’s Heart of Darkness.Ron Wilburn - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:165-217.
Davidson’s Transcendental Externalism.Jason Bridges - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):290-315.
Scepticism and its Sources.Samir Okasha - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):610–632.
Davidson's Epistemology.Ernest Sosa - 2003 - In Kirk Ludwig (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Donald Davidson. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-07-21

Total views
1,087 ( #2,961 of 2,324,566 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
132 ( #3,565 of 2,324,566 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes