Technoetic Arts 16 (2):137-151 (2018)

Authors
Claudia Westermann
Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China
Abstract
This paper presents and discusses design studio outcomes developed in response to a studio brief linked to the Fun Palace Futures initiative of the Royal British Institute of British Architects (RIBA) in honour of architect Cedric Price and artist Joan Littlewood. The studio brief was collaboratively developed by the authors. Its core question was: How could the thoughts that guided the development and design of the Fun Palace – a project that was never built but is still today cited as a model for thinking flexible and open architecture – be re-interpreted and renewed for the future? This line of thinking guided the initial and experimental research phase, during which students developed an understanding of what indeterminacy is or could be. The paper shows that through the translation of some of the essential principles of the Fun Palace project into pedagogical instruments, students were enabled to approach the questions of indeterminacy in an open and innovative manner. The paper argues that the use of a variety of media, which often went far beyond the conventional architectural pallet, and the introduction of media shifts were crucial in assisting the students in developing their own tools for creating a new kind of open and flexible architecture. The paper presents this pedagogic approach. We show that the conditions of indeterminacy, uncertainty, chance and change, hold potential for framing the design and creation of a new kind of dynamic architecture, and for initiating experimental architectural thinking in a design studio setting.
Keywords architecture  design  indeterminacy  philosophy of art
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1386/tear.16.2.137_1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

LEGO® Formalism in Architecture.Saul Fisher - 2017 - In Roy T. Cook & Sondra Bacharach (eds.), Lego and Philosophy: Constructing Reality Brick by Brick. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. pp. 27-37.
Against Quantum Indeterminacy.David Glick - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):204-213.
Deep Metaphysical Indeterminacy.Bradford Skow - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):851 - 858.
Must We Know What We Mean?Kuang-Ming Cheng - 2005 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):21-33.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-03-15

Total views
50 ( #207,935 of 2,438,909 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #34,661 of 2,438,909 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes