An adverbial meinongian theory

Analysis 39 (March):75-81 (1979)
A fundamental assumption of Alexius Meinong's 1904 Theory of Objects is the act-content-object analysis of psychological experiences. I suggest that Meinong's theory need not be based on this analysis, but that an adverbial theory might suffice. I then defend the adverbial alternative against an objection raised by Roderick Chisholm, and conclude by presenting an apparently more serious objection based on a paradox discovered by Romane Clark.
Keywords Adverbs  Epistemology  Object  Meinong
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/39.2.75
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,470
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Seyed N. Mousavian (2010). Neo-Meinongian neo-Russellians. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):229-259.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

97 ( #48,669 of 1,925,583 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #124,665 of 1,925,583 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.