Phronesis 47 (3):224-252 (2002)

Authors
Raphael Woolf
King's College London
Abstract
Relatively little attention has been paid to Socrates' argument against akrasia in Plato's "Protagoras" as an example of Socratic method. Yet seen from this perspective the argument has some rather unusual features: in particular, the presence of an impersonal interlocutor ("the many") and the absence of the crisp and explicit argumentation that is typical of Socratic elenchus. I want to suggest that these features are problematic, considerably more so than has sometimes been supposed, and to offer a reading of the argument that accounts for them. My reading revolves around the connections between Socratic method, consistency and akrasia. I argue that Socrates' discussion of akrasia aims at exposing the interlocutor's inconsistency, and to this extent is typical of Socratic inquiry; but it is also untypical, insofar as Socrates' chief concern here is with the inconsistency between an interlocutor's statements and his actions (what I call "word-deed inconsistency") rather than, as more usually, inconsistency among an interlocutor's various statements ("word-word inconsistency"). I use this reading to show how the akrasia argument, despite its untypical features, is not just a variant, but in an important way a paradigm, of Socratic method
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15685280260458136
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Language of Morals.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1952 - Oxford University Press.
How Is Weakness of the Will Possible?Donald Davidson - 1969 - In Joel Feinberg (ed.), Moral Concepts. Oxford University Press.
The Fragility of Goodness.Martha Nussbaum - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (7):376-383.
Plato’s Ethics.Terence Irwin - 1995 - Oxford University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Plato's Protagoras the Hedonist.Joshua Wilburn - 2016 - Classical Philology 113 (3):224-244.
Socrates Unbound: Plato’s Protagoras.Martin J. Plax - 2008 - Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 25 (2):285-304.
El problema de la akrasia en las Disertaciones de Epicteto.Rodrigo Sebastián Braicovich - 2008 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 41:109-130.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Four Educators in Plato's Theaetetus.Avi I. Mintz - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (4):657-673.
The Philosophy of Socrates.Gregory Vlastos - 1971 - Garden City, N.Y., Anchor Books.
Aristotle on Pleasure and the Worst Form of Akrasia.Devin Henry - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (3):255-270.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
145 ( #73,266 of 63,397 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #28,286 of 63,397 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes