How to pass a Turing test: Syntactic semantics, natural-language understanding, and first-person cognition

Abstract
I advocate a theory of syntactic semantics as a way of understanding how computers can think (and how the Chinese-Room-Argument objection to the Turing Test can be overcome): (1) Semantics, considered as the study of relations between symbols and meanings, can be turned into syntax – a study of relations among symbols (including meanings) – and hence syntax (i.e., symbol manipulation) can suffice for the semantical enterprise (contra Searle). (2) Semantics, considered as the process of understanding one domain (by modeling it) in terms of another, can be viewed recursively: The base case of semantic understanding –understanding a domain in terms of itself – is syntactic understanding. (3) An internal (or narrow ), first-person point of view makes an external (or wide ), third-person point of view otiose for purposes of understanding cognition
Keywords Chinese Room  Internalism  Logic  Representation  Semantics  Syntax  Turing Test
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1008319409770
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Yes, She Was!William Rapaport - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (1):3-17.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

121 ( #40,783 of 2,178,111 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #166,129 of 2,178,111 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums