The Monist 82 (1):109-130 (1999)

What is the computational notion of “implementation”? It is not individuation, instantiation, reduction, or supervenience. It is, I suggest, semantic interpretation.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind  Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI monist19998212
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Think That the Brain is Not a Computer?Marcin Miłkowski - 2016 - APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 16 (2):22-28.
Semiotic Systems, Computers, and the Mind: How Cognition Could Be Computing.William J. Rapaport - 2012 - International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 2 (1):32-71.
Syntax, Semantics, and Computer Programs.William J. Rapaport - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 33 (2):309-321.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why God is Not a Semantic Realist.D. L. Anderson - 2002 - In William P. Alston (ed.), Realism & Antirealism. Cornell Up. pp. 131--48.
Truth, Amphigory, and the Semantic Interpretation of Sentences.Danny D. Steinberg - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):217.
Interpreting Metaphor.James Andrew Chastain - 2003 - Dissertation, Tulane University


Added to PP index

Total views
537 ( #9,731 of 2,331,410 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #9,280 of 2,331,410 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes