Authors
Vera Raposo
University of Macau
Abstract
Although Chinese law imposes informed consent for medical treatments, the Chinese understanding of this requirement is very different from the European one, mostly due to the influence of Confucianism. Chinese doctors and relatives are primarily interested in protecting the patient, even from the truth; thus, patients are commonly uninformed of their medical conditions, often at the family’s request. The family plays an important role in health care decisions, even substituting their decisions for the patient’s. Accordingly, instead of personal informed consent, what actually exists is ‘family informed consent’. From a Western perspective, these features of Chinese law and Chinese culture might seem strange, contradicting our understanding of doctor-patient relationship and even the very essence of self-determination and fundamental rights. However, we cannot forget the huge influence of cultural factors in these domains, and that ‘Western’ informed consent is grounded on the individualistic nature of Western culture. This article will underline the differences between the Western and the Chinese perspectives, clarifying how each of them must be understood in its own cultural environment. But, while still respecting Chinese particularities, this paper advocates that China adopt patient individual informed consent because this is the only solution compatible with human dignity and human rights.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-018-9835-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,268
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Foundations of Bioethics.H. T. Engelhardt - 1986 - Ethics 98 (2):402-405.
Informed Consent: Its History, Meaning, and Present Challenges.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):515-523.

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Authority of the Common Morality.Griffin Trotter - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):427-440.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Barriers To Informed Consent In Japan.Atsushi Asai - 1996 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 6 (4):91-93.
Using Informed Consent to Save Trust.Nir Eyal - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):437-444.
Other Signing and Patients' Rights.Qun Gong - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (7):15-30.
Informed Consent and Routinisation.Thomas Ploug & Soren Holm - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):214-218.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Consent and Informational Responsibility.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
Should We Nudge Informed Consent?Thom Brooks - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (6):22-23.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-03-31

Total views
22 ( #490,718 of 2,444,962 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #185,844 of 2,444,962 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes