Argumentation 27 (1):7-30 (2013)

Although he does not provide a general analysis of argumentation, Aristotle is a highly influential source of modern argumentation theory. In his treatises the Topics, the Sophistical Refutations and the Rhetoric, Aristotle presents complementary aspects of a theory of sound arguments that are seen as the most effective means of persuasion. Aristotle’s central notion of a deductive argument (sullogismos) does not include references to an addressee, the situative context or non-verbal aspects of communication, and thus differs from some modern views on argumentation. A deductive argument in the Aristotelian sense is a sequence of intellectual steps where the conclusion follows of necessity from the premises. Aristotle does not relativize or relax this notion but takes other factors into account by providing supplementary theoretical elements. For example, he reflects on acceptable premises (endoxa), the adjustment of rhetorical arguments to the horizon of the audience, methods of finding premises on the basis of argumentative schemes (topoi), the use of non-argumentative means of persuasion, and a framework of implicit discourse rules. Many of these themes are, albeit under a different name, still discussed in modern argumentation theory
Keywords Aristotle  Dialectic  Rhetoric  Deductive Argument  Topoi  Persuasion  Fallacy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-012-9280-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - London, England: Vale Press.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Was Aristotle a Virtue Argumentation Theorist?Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - In Joseph Andrew Bjelde, David Merry & Christopher Roser (eds.), Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity. Cham: Springer. pp. 215-229.
Endoxa and Epistemology in Aristotle’s Topics.Joseph Bjelde - 2021 - In Joseph Andrew Bjelde, David Merry & Christopher Roser (eds.), Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity. Cham: Springer. pp. 201-214.
Pistis,_ Persuasion, and _Logos in Aristotle.Owen Goldin - 2020 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 41 (1):49-70.
In Defence of a Fallacy.Richard Davies - 2020 - Studia Semiotyczne 34 (2):25-42.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Persuasion or Alignment?Christian Plantin - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):83-97.
Argumentation as Rational Persuasion.J. Anthony Blair - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):71-81.
Aristotle's Demonstrative Logic.John Corcoran - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (1):1-20.
Fallacies of Accident.David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):267-289.
Persuasion: The Practical Face of Logic.Katarzyna Budzyńska - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):343-362.
Aristotle’s Syllogistic, Modern Deductive Logic, and Scientific Demonstration.Edward M. Engelmann - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (4):535-552.


Added to PP index

Total views
47 ( #242,972 of 2,519,681 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,824 of 2,519,681 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes