Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (3):584-610 (2013)
A familiar slogan in the literature on temporal experience is that ‘a succession of appearances, in and of itself, does not amount to an experience of succession’. I show that we can distinguish between a strong and a weak sense of this slogan. I diagnose the strong interpretation of the slogan as requiring the support of an assumption I call the ‘Seems→Seemed’ claim. I then show that commitment to this assumption comes at a price: if we accept it, we either have to reject the extremely plausible idea that experience is as it seems, or we are forced to provide an account of temporal experience that isn’t compatible with the phenomenology. I conclude by noting that the only plausible interpretation of the slogan is the weak interpretation, and outline a positive account of temporal experience, according to which an appearance of succession requires a succession of appearances
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy of Mind|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Time and the Observer.Daniel C. Dennett & Kinsbourne Marcel - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):183-201.
The Images of Time: An Essay on Temporal Representation.Robin Le Poidevin - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Temporal Experience, Temporal Passage and the Cognitive Sciences.Samuel Baron, John Cusbert, Matt Farr, Maria Kon & Kristie Miller - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (8):560-571.
Breaking the Silence: Motion Silencing and Experience of Change.Ian Phillips - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):693-707.
Sensorama: A Phenomenalist Analysis of Spacetime and Its Contents.Michael Pelczar - 2015 - Oxford University Press.
Similar books and articles
Must an Appearance of Succession Involve a Succession of Appearances?Michael Pelczar - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):49-63.
A Humean Temporal Logic.Donald L. M. Baxter - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000 (Analytic Philosophy and Logic):209-216.
The Law of Succession Under Diocletian O. E. Tellegen-Couperus: Testamentary Succession in the Constitutions of Diocletian. Pp. Xiii + 231. Uitgeverij Terra: Zutphen, 1982. [REVIEW]B. W. Frier - 1984 - The Classical Review 34 (02):234-236.
Managing CEO Succession: New Models for a New Era.Margaret Exley - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (2):139-149.
The Intuition of Simultaneity: Zugleichsein and the Constitution of Extensive Magnitudes.Michael J. Olson - 2010 - Kant-Studien 101 (4):429-444.
Internal and External Causal Explanations of the Universe.Quentin Smith - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 79 (3):283 - 310.
Succession in the Late Roman Republic Alan Watson: The Law of Succession in the Later Roman Republic. Pp. Xii+209. Oxford: Clarendo Press, 1971. Cloth, £3·50 Net. [REVIEW]John Crook - 1974 - The Classical Review 24 (02):240-243.
Plant Succession and Tree Architecture: An Attempt at Reconciling Two Scales of Analysis of Vegetation Dynamics.Jeanne Millet, André Bouchard & Claude Édelin - 1998 - Acta Biotheoretica 46 (1):1-22.
Synthetic Unities of Experience.Leslie Stevenson - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):281-306.
Added to index2012-07-26
Total downloads98 ( #52,176 of 2,171,798 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #76,305 of 2,171,798 )
How can I increase my downloads?