An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):649-661 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The legitimacy of clinical ethics consultation is often implied to rest on the legitimacy of moral expertise. In turn, moral expertise seems subject to many serious critiques, the success of which implies that clinical ethics consultation is illegitimate. I explore a number of these critiques, and forward “ethics expertise,” as distinct from “moral expertise,” as a way of avoiding these critiques. I argue that “ethics expertise” succeeds in avoiding most of the critiques, captures what clinical ethics consultants might justifiably do, and expresses a subject matter which can be taught and assessed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):1 - 9.
The possibility of ethical expertise.Bruce D. Weinstein - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1):1-187.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
What kind of doing is clinical ethics?George J. Agich - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
Voices and time: The venture of clinical ethics.Richard M. Zaner - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):9-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-16

Downloads
36 (#326,703)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lisa Marie Rasmussen
University of North Carolina, Charlotte