- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Not all research is equal: Taking social science research into account
American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):17 – 18 (2008)
Abstract
No abstractAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Taking Our Obligations to Research Participants Seriously: Disclosing Individual Results of Genetic Research.Teri A. Manolio - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):32-34.
Barriers To Research Using Controlled Drugs Are Not Created Equal.Andrew Plunk & Paul T. Harrell - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (4):54-56.
Equal Protection Clause Enforcement as a Model for Protecting Vulnerable Human Research Subjects.Sandra Anderson Garcia - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):81-82.
A View From the Borderlands of Philosophical Bioethics and Empirical Social Science Research: How the 'Is' Can Inform the 'Ought'.Catherine Myser - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):88-91.
Solidarity in Global Health Research—Are the Stakes Equal?Amrita Daftary & A. M. Viens - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (5):59-62.
Universal and Uniform Protections of Human Subjects in Research.Adil E. Shamoo & Jack Schwartz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):7-9.
Universal and Uniform Protections of Human Subjects in Research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):7-9.
The Impact of the Humanities in Science and Technology Research: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Ethical, Social, and Legal Impacts of Science and Innovation.Aviv Shemma, Roy Meirom & Dov Greenbaum - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (2):106-107.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
42 (#636,872)
6 months
4 (#1,208,972)
2009-01-28
Downloads
42 (#636,872)
6 months
4 (#1,208,972)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Case against Ethics Review in the Social Sciences.Zachary M. Schrag - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (4):120-131.
The case for ethics review in the social sciences: Drawing from practice at Queen Mary University of London.Maxine Robertson - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (2):69-76.
Reporting Ethics Committee Approval in Public Administration Research.Sara R. Jordan & Phillip W. Gray - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):77-97.
References found in this work
A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics.John D. Arras - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (2):69-85.
Sustaining public trust: Falling short in the protection of human research participants.Anna C. Mastroianni - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (3):pp. 8-9.
Universal and Uniform Protections of Human Subjects in Research.Jack Schwartz & Adil E. Shamoo - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):3-5.
Universal and Uniform Protections of Human Subjects in Research.Adil E. Shamoo & Jack Schwartz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):7-9.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-nlds7 uwo