Problems with Minimal-Risk Research Oversight: A Threat to Academic Freedom?

IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (3):11 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A subcommittee of the American Association of University Professors has published a report, “Research on Human Subjects: Academic Freedom and the Institutional Review Board” , which argues that institutional review board oversight may pose a threat to academic freedom, and that a different oversight model based on departmental review would both maintain subject protection and eliminate the threat. But the report does not demonstrate that IRBs pose a threat to academic freedom, and using departmental oversight may not sufficiently protect human subjects of research, could introduce other problems, and would itself pose threats to academic freedom. Instead, some alternative methods of streamlining IRB oversight for certain types of research would better address the practical problems currently encountered

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,925

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bringing oversight review in line with online research.Stephen Lilley - 2003 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 1 (4):235-246.
New Threats to Academic Freedom.Francesca Minerva - 2013 - Bioethics 28 (4):157-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
45 (#548,601)

6 months
17 (#181,050)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lisa Marie Rasmussen
University of North Carolina, Charlotte

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references