Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):307 - 316 (2007)

Douglas B. Rasmussen
St. John's University
In response to Robert Hartford's criticisms of his Spring 2006 Journal of Ayn Rand Studies essay, "Regarding Choice and the Foundations of Morality," Rasmussen argues against "the official" interpretation of Rand's ethics as resting on a basic "choice to live." Drawing from his work with Douglas Den Uyl, Rasmussen argues that Rand's metaethics is best understood in "biocentric," neo-Aristotelian terms: that human choice does not set the context in which it operates and that "man's life qua man" is the natural end of human life
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,425
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rand on Obligation and Value.Douglas B. Rasmussen - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):69 - 86.
Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Rand the Moderate.Alexander Tabarrok - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):457 - 467.
Reply to Johnson and Rasmussen: Another Look at Abortion.Tibor R. Machan - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (2):449 - 456.


Added to PP index

Total views
14 ( #687,327 of 2,420,953 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,702 of 2,420,953 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes