Abstract
1950s witnessed a drastic change in the history of British drama. The publication of John Osborne’s masterpiece, Look Back in Anger in 1956 radicalised the British theatre. The play was a blow against establishment. Osborne portrayed Jimmy Porter, the anti-hero of the play. He is frustrated and malcontent. He attacks the establishment in every sense. Following the success of this play, a generation of writers emerged who are labelled as “angry young men”, though they were not a unified group. This media-created uncommon group included John Osborne, Kinsgsley Amis, John Wain, Collin Wilson, Allan Sillitoe, John Arden, Arnold Wesker and Harold Pinter. Shelagh Delaney, after publication of her successful and rebelling play, A Taste of Honey (1956) had been included in this group but it may not be appropriate to stick the journalistic label “angry young men” to her because she differs from most of them and the label itself obviously implies its patriarchal nature. This “new wave” of British young playwrights had tried to radicalise not only themes but also structures and styles of their plays. Hostile to anything that was “high-brow”, these British playwrights were revolutionary in dealing with working class characters and themes. They rejected the style and subject of educated upper middle class. Expressing the discontent and frustration of the newly educated lower class, they were explicitly and intensely against establishment. Their plays were termed as “Kitchen-Sink” Drama. It was a term that gained popularity in Britain in the middle and late 1950s. The term refers to pays which were set in ordinary domestic settings. They depict lower strata of British society and their struggle to survive in post-war period. According to Collin’s Dictionary, it is a term which refers to a type of drama of the 1950s depicting sordid aspects of domestic reality.
Keywords British Drama  John Osborne  Look Back In Anger  Shelagh Delaney  A Taste of Honey  Jo  Helen
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

"Kant and the Claims of Taste": Paul Guyer. [REVIEW]Harold Osborne - 1980 - British Journal of Aesthetics 20 (3):272.
Hume's Standard and the Diversity of Aesthetic Taste.H. Osborne - 1967 - British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (1):50-56.
Acquired Taste.Kevin Melchionne - 2007 - Contemporary Aesthetics.
Bees Without Honey, and Callimachean Taste.Gregory Crane - 1987 - American Journal of Philology 108 (2).
Just a Matter of Taste.Vivian Mizrahi - 2017 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (2):411-431.
Essays on Taste From Letters Concerning Taste, Third Edition.John Gilbert Cooper, John Armstrong & Ralph Cohen - 1951 - William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, University of California.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-22

Total views
287 ( #33,331 of 2,454,555 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #11,424 of 2,454,555 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes