Can One Prove that Something Exists Beyond Consciousness? A Śaiva Criticism of the Sautrāntika Inference of External Objects

Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):479-501 (2011)

This article examines how the Kashmiri non-dualistic Śaiva philosophers Utpaladeva (tenth century) and Abhinavagupta (10th–11th centuries) present and criticize a theory expounded by certain Buddhist philosophers, identified by the two Śaiva authors as Sautrāntikas. According to this theory, no entity external to consciousness can ever be perceived since perceived objects are nothing but internal aspects (ākāra) of consciousness. Nonetheless we must infer the existence of external entities so as to account for the fact that consciousness is aware of a variety of objects: just as a mirror takes on a variegated appearance only by reflecting a multiplicity of objects that remain external to it, in the same way, phenomenal variety can be explained only by assuming the existence of various objects external to consciousness. In Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikās I, 5, 8–9 and their commentaries, Utpaladeva and Abhinavagupta endeavour to criticize this theory, which challenges their own idealistic principles: according to them, the Sautrāntikas’ inference is neither legitimate nor even possible. The passage is particularly telling as regards the strategy developed by Pratyabhijñā philosophers with respect to their Buddhist opponents: they make use of certain arguments propounded by Dharmakīrti in defense of Vijñānavāda in order to criticize the Sautrāntikas’ inference, but they also exploit this discussion to underline the superiority of their idealism over that of the Vijñānavādins
Keywords Utpaladeva  Abhinavagupta  Pratyabhijnñā  Vijñānavāda  Sautrāntika  Consciousness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-011-9143-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,293
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Otherness in the Pratyabhijñā Philosophy.Isabelle Ratié - 2007 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (4):313-370.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Abhinavagupta on Reflection in the Tantrāloka.Mrinal Kaul - forthcoming - Journal of Indian Philosophy:1-29.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Otherness in the Pratyabhijñā Philosophy.Isabelle Ratié - 2007 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (4):313-370.
Idealism, Intentionality, and Nonexistent Objects.Gordon Knight - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:43-52.
The Spatial Content of Experience.Brad Thompson - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):146-184.
What Sort of Epistemological Realist Was Thomas Reid?Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2006 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (2):111-124.
Direct Realism and Perceptual Consciousness.Susanna Siegel - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):378-410.
Externalism and Armchair Knowledge.Martin Davies - 2000 - In Paul A. Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the a Priori. Oxford University Press. pp. 384--414.
Why God Cannot Think.Matt McCormick - 2000 - Philo 3 (1):5-19.
On Self-Awareness in the Sautrāntika Epistemology.Shinya Moriyama - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):261-277.
Consciousness and its Objects.Colin McGinn - 2004 - Oxford University Press University Press.
Introspecting Representations.Susanna Radovic - 2005 - Dissertation, Gothenburg University


Added to PP index

Total views
63 ( #132,444 of 2,270,963 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #267,426 of 2,270,963 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature