Neuroscience and the mind

Mind and Language 13 (1):132-137 (1998)
Francis Crick has identified a doctrine‐the neuron doctrine‐which he apparently regards as both true and astonishing. I begin by carefully articulating Crick’s doctrine, arguing that whilst plausible it is certainly not astonishing. I then consider a related doctrine, the biological neuroscience thesis . According to BNT, mental science is biological neuroscience, where biological neuroscience is pretty much exhausted by neuroanatomy, neurophysiology and neurochemistry. Stoljar and Gold argue that BNT is unsupported by current scientific developments. I argue that well‐established results in the cognitive sciences show that it is false
Keywords Cognitive Science  Language  Neuroscience  Crick, F
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00069
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,317
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
35 ( #164,885 of 2,223,727 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #423,227 of 2,223,727 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature