Why B-Flat Is Not Natural: Reply to Dyck

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (2):187-191 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unruly Tones: A Reply to Ravasio.John Dyck - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (2):191-194.
Flat Belly Overnight Review By Andrew Raposo. [REVIEW]Raposo Andrew - 2016 - Global Journal of Management and Business Research 16 (12):3.
Natural Sounds and Musical Sounds: A Dual Distinction.John Dyck - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (3):291-302.
Flat Sets.Arthur D. Grainger - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):1012-1021.
Response to Maarten Van Dyck’s Commentary.Paolo Palmieri - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3):319-321.
Locke, Natural Law and Civil Peace: Reply to Tate.Paul Bou-Habib - 2017 - European Journal of Political Theory 16 (1):1474885116650422.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-27

Downloads
16 (#662,004)

6 months
1 (#414,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matteo Ravasio
Peking University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural Sounds and Musical Sounds: A Dual Distinction.John Dyck - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (3):291-302.

Add more references