In Samuel Scheffler (ed.), Consequentialism and its Critics. Oxford University Press (1988)
There are many forms of utilitarianism, and the development of the theory has continued in recent years. I shall not survey these forms here, nor take account of the numerous refinements found in contemporary discussions. My aim is to work out a theory of justice that represents an alternative to utilitarian thought generally and so to all of these different versions of it. I believe that the contrast between the contract view and utilitarianism remains essentially the same in all these cases. Therefore I shall compare justice as fairness with familiar variants of intuitionism, perfectionism, and utilitarianism in order to bring out the underlying differences in the simplest way. With this end in mind, the kind of utilitarianism I shall describe here is the strict classical doctrine which receives perhaps its clearest and most accessible formulation in Sidgwick. The main idea is that society is rightly ordered, and therefore just, when its major institutions are arranged so as to achieve the greatest net balance of satisfaction summed over all the individuals belonging to it.9..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Morality and Leadership: Examining the Ethics of Transformational Leadership. [REVIEW]Sen Sendjaya - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (1):75-86.
Similar books and articles
Economic Analysis, Common-Sense Morality and Utilitarianism.J. Moreh - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (1):115 - 143.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads277 ( #10,988 of 2,153,578 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #23,180 of 2,153,578 )
How can I increase my downloads?