Chronique et motifs de la controverse entre les écoles médicales de Paris et de Montpellier

In Pascal Nouvel (ed.), Repenser le vitalisme: histoire et philosophie du vitalisme. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. pp. 33-55 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The controversy between the medical schools of Paris and Montpellier extends roughly from the death of Barthez (1806) to the publication of the Introduction to the study of experimental medicine of Claude Bernard (1865), with a peak during which the controversy merges with the polemic between Louis Peisse and Jacques Lordat (1840-1843). This study aims to document as accurately as possible the arguments that were exchanged during this controversy, by seeking their reasons and explaining how the experimental medicine in Paris ultimately took the lead over the vitalism championed by the school of medicine in Montpellier.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
80 (#222,873)

6 months
3 (#1,434,963)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominique Raynaud
Université Grenoble Alpes

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism.Harry M. Collins - 1981 - Social Studies of Science 11:3-10.

Add more references