Critical Notice of Stalnaker's "Propositions: Ontology and Logic" [Book Review]

Analysis (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Propositional anaphors.Peter van Elswyk - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (4):1055-1075.
Russell-Myhill paradox.Kevin C. Klement - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Cognitive propositions.Stephen Schiffer - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (9):2551-2563.
A Defense of Propositions.Joseph Gwyer Moore - 1994 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Russell's paradox of the totality of propositions.Nino B. Cocchiarella - 2000 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (1):25-37.
"That"-clauses and propositional anaphors.Peter van Elswyk - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (10):2861-2875.
Realism Behind the Veil. [REVIEW]Nicholas K. Jones - 2014 - Analysis 74 (4):721-730.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-15

Downloads
343 (#63,078)

6 months
186 (#19,636)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ray Buchanan
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Propositional Content.Peter Hanks - 2015 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
New Thinking About Propositions.Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames & Jeff Speaks - 2014 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. Edited by Scott Soames & Jeffrey Speaks.
Inquiry.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1984 - Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (4):515-519.
Analyticity reconsidered.Paul Artin Boghossian - 1996 - Noûs 30 (3):360-391.

View all 15 references / Add more references