International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):123 – 141 (2009)
I endeavour in this article to present Ibn Taymiyya's theory of nominal definition as an alternative to logical definition. Ibn Taymiyya argues that nominal definition is based on concrete principles that are subject to experiment. Furthermore, the function of definition is akin to the 'name' because it aims at distinguishing any one object from others but not at reaching the entity of things. Nominal definition aims to define the name or the named, and this aim can be achieved by translation or by interpretation. Translation is the movement from one name to another or from one named object to another. Interpretation is movement from a name to a named object or from a named object to a name
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Studies in the History of Philosophy and Religion.Harry Austryn Wolfson - 1973 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Classification and Explanation in Aristotle's Theory of Definition.Greg Bayer - 1998 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (4):487-505.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Posterior Analytics and the Definition of Happiness in NE I.Carlo Natali - 2011 - Phronesis 55 (4):304-324.
Nominal Definitions and Logical Consequence in the Peano School.Consuegra Francisco Rodriguez - 1997 - Theoria 12 (1):125-137.
Essence, Existence, and Nominal Definition in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics II 8-10.Daniel Devereux & David Demoss - 1988 - Phronesis 33 (1):133-154.
Translation and Interpretation in Ibn Taymiyya's Logical Definition.Sobhi Rayan - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1047 - 1065.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads14 ( #327,050 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?