Philosophy Compass 2 (3):411–427 (2007)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Forthcoming in Philosophical Compass. I explain why plural quantifiers and predicates have been thought to be philosophically significant.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00060.x |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
View all 103 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Many and the One: A Philosophical Study of Plural Logic.Salvatore Florio & Øystein Linnebo - 2021 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
View all 12 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part II.Byeong-uk Yi - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):239-288.
Plurals and Complexes.Keith Hossack - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):411-443.
Number-Neutral Bare Plurals and the Multiplicity Implicature.Eytan Zweig - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (4):353-407.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
166 ( #70,677 of 2,507,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,263 of 2,507,562 )
2009-01-28
Total views
166 ( #70,677 of 2,507,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,263 of 2,507,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
