Plurals
Philosophy Compass 2 (3):411–427 (2007)
| Abstract |
Forthcoming in Philosophical Compass. I explain why plural quantifiers and predicates have been thought to be philosophically significant.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00060.x |
| Options |
Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
|
Download optionsOur Archive
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 29,440
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- doi.wiley.com (no proxy)
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com (no proxy)
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com [2] (no proxy)
- web.mit.edu
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
View all 57 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articlesThe Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part II.Byeong-uk Yi - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):239-288.
Plurals and Complexes.K. Hossack - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):411-443.
Number-Neutral Bare Plurals and the Multiplicity Implicature.Eytan Zweig - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (4):353-407.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total downloads
106 ( #48,049 of 2,180,188 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #105,536 of 2,180,188 )
2009-01-28
Total downloads
106 ( #48,049 of 2,180,188 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #105,536 of 2,180,188 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads
My notes
Discussion
Nothing in this forum yet.
