Replies to Greco and Turner

Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2617-2620 (2015)

Agustin Rayo
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Dan Greco and Jason Turner wrote two fantastic critiques of my book, The Construction of Logical Space. Greco’s critique suggests that the book can be given a Kuhnian interpretation, with a Carnapian twist. Here I embrace that interpretation. Turner criticizes one of the views I develop in the book. Here I identify an avenue of resistance
Keywords Greco  Turner  Carnap  Structure
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0426-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,419
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Grounding, Essence, And Identity.Fabrice Correia & Alexander Skiles - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3):642-670.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the General Argument Against Internalism.John Turri - 2009 - Synthese 170 (1):147 - 153.
Evidential Support, Reliability, and Hume's Problem of Induction.Chris Tucker - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):503-519.
The Epistemology of ‘Just is’-Statements.Daniel Greco - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2599-2607.


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #184,702 of 2,272,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #257,206 of 2,272,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature