Underestimation of prior remembering and susceptibility to false memories: Two sides of the same coin?

Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1144-1153 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In two studies, we explored whether susceptibility to false memories and the underestimation of prior memories tap overlapping memory phenomena. Study 1 investigated this issue by administering the Deese/Roediger–McDermott task and the forgot-it-all-along task to an undergraduate sample . It was furthermore explored how performances on these tasks correlate with clinically relevant traits such as fantasy proneness, dissociative experiences, and cognitive efficiency. Results show that FIA and DRM performances are relatively independent from each other, suggesting that these measures empirically apparently refer to separate dimensions. However, they do not seem to define different profiles in terms of dissociation, fantasy proneness, and cognitive efficiency. Study 2 replicated the finding of relative independence between false memory propensity and the underestimation of prior memories in people with a history of childhood sexual abuse



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Adaptive misbeliefs and false memories.John Sutton, Ryan T. McKay & Daniel C. Dennett - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):535-536.
Remembering as a psychological event.Linda J. Hayes - 1998 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 18 (2):135-143.
Remembering without knowing.Keith Lehrer & Joseph Richard - 1975 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 1 (1):121-126.
Attachment: the two sides of one coin.Bernhard A. Eble - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (3):444-445.


Added to PP

15 (#849,371)

6 months
3 (#643,273)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?