Noûs 36 (3):436–464 (2002)
The aim of this essay is to show that the subject-matter of ontology is richer than one might have thought. Our route will be indirect. We will argue that there are circumstances under which standard ﬁrst-order regimentation is unacceptable, and that more appropriate varieties of regimentation lead to unexpected kinds of ontological commitment.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
On the Innocence and Determinacy of Plural Quantification.Salvatore Florio & Øystein Linnebo - 2016 - Noûs 50 (3):565–583.
Similar books and articles
What Am I? Virtual Machines and the Mind/Body Problem.John L. Pollock - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):237–309.
Concepts, Intension, and Identity in Tibetan Philosophy of Language.Jonathan Stoltz - 2006 - Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 29 (2):383-400.
Objects and Their Environments: From Aristotle to Ecological Ontology.Barry Smith - 2001 - In The Life and Motion of Socio-Economic Units. Taylor & Francis. pp. 79--97.
Partial Word Order Freezing in Dutch.Gerlof J. Bouma & Petra Hendriks - 2012 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (1):53-73.
Proper Names in Early Word Learning: Rethinking a Theoretical Account of Lexical Development.D. Geoffrey Hall - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):404-432.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads80 ( #65,316 of 2,168,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #27,914 of 2,168,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?