In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press (2010)
Using the accounts of Gewirth and Griffin as examples, the article criticises accounts of human rights as those are understood in human rights practices, which regard them as rights all human beings have in virtue of their humanity. Instead it suggests that (with Rawls) human rights set the limits to the sovereignty of the state, but criticises Rawls conflation of sovereignty with legitimate authority. The resulting conception takes human rights, like other rights, to be contingent on social conditions, and in particular on the nature of the international system.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
To Be or Not to Be: Charles Beitz on the Philosophy of Human Rights.Adam Etinson - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (4):441-448.
Philosophers, Activists, and Radicals: A Story of Human Rights and Other Scandals. [REVIEW]Joseph Hoover & Marta Iñiguez De Heredia - 2011 - Human Rights Review 12 (2):191-220.
Similar books and articles
Are Human Rights Essentially Triggers for Intervention?John Tasioulas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):938-950.
Human Rights in Cuba, El Salvador, and Nicaragua: A Sociological Perspective on Human Rights Abuse.Mayra Gómez - 2003 - Routledge.
The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development, and Significance.John Mahoney - 2007 - Blackwell.
Human Rights and Human Dignity.Schroeder Doris - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323-335.
The Concept of Rights in Contemporary Human Rights Discourse.Christine Chwaszcza - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (3):333-364.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads663 ( #1,823 of 2,172,937 )
Recent downloads (6 months)29 ( #10,347 of 2,172,937 )
How can I increase my downloads?